Main Page Sitemap

Concepts: The Developmental State

The government budget for higher education has risen both in absolute amount as well as in relative share to overall education budget. A document review guideline, which follows the components of the


Read more

Christianity in the United States

To some, the landscape may seem dull, for heights of more than 2,000 feet (600 metres) are unusual, and truly rough terrain is almost lacking. 92 Methodists looked on their youth


Read more

Fraternity Lifestyles and Initiations

8 Samuel Mason, unlike most incidents of lethal hazings, those involved in the death of Samuel Mason actually got jail time. The robes normally have the organizations crest stitched onto the robe


Read more

The Two Sides of Power


the Two Sides of Power

2000 ) express the common view of power as a negative influence and unhelpful in the building of relationship quality, an area in which the most important cited attributes of a good supply chain relationship are trust, integration, mutual understanding. The implications for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 4(4 184191 View Article Google Scholar Ireland RD, Webb JW (2007) A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Supply Chain Manag 7(1 2440 View Article Google Scholar Zhao X, Huo B, Flynn BB, Yeung JHY (2007) Impact of power and relationship commitment on manufacturer-customer integration in a supply chain. J Mark Res 13(1 311 View Article Google Scholar Carlsmith KM (2006) The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Retailing 55(2 7994 Google Scholar Wilkinson IF (1981) Power, conflict and satisfaction in distribution channels: an empirical study. If in a group of cooperating actors a known free rider receives a punishment he deserves, the overall cooperativeness within the group increases (Carlsmith 2006 ; Carlsmith. J Mark Res 18(2 3950 View Article Google Scholar Frazier GL, Antia KD (1995) Exchange relationships and interfirm power in channels of distribution. ( 1997 ) also support the idea that coordination is different from information sharing. In: Swingle P (ed) The structure of conflict.



the Two Sides of Power

Stationers Hall, L ondon EC4M 7DD. Contact information: Tandy Wakeford 44 (0)1327.

The remaining indicators represent more than 50 of the share of the variance of each indicator in respect to the corresponding latent variable and can be considered as the most reliable. Ural University, Ekaterinburg Google Scholar Kalafatis SP (2000) Buyerseller relationships along channels of distribution. Uusin versio ilmestyi suomen kielellä elokuussa 2016. The Belknap Press, Cambridge Google Scholar Condliffe JB (1944) Economic power as an instrument of national policy. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Google Scholar Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ (2005) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, 2nd edn. Am Econ Rev 90(4 980994 View Article Google Scholar Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Exercising coercive power against other members of the supply chain might have short-term benefits for the focal organization but reduces its success in the long term (Cousins 2002 ). According to our assumptions, reward power should have a negative effect on cooperation and a positive effect on coordination.

The Two Sides of Power
the Two Sides of Power

Wealth and Power: An American Dream,


Sitemap