They expect and demand a certain amount of privacy and federal and state laws oblige them. How far will you go to save your country? Jean Jacques Rousseau affirms this. Abraham Maslows hierarchy of needs places security just above physical needs such as food, water, and shelter. Not all camera installations are meant to catch employees in the act of doing something wrong.
Security is for protection and one feels confident when he has arranged enough security measures. What then are the differences between security and protection? Security must come before rights. Without security first, rights become invalid and government is unable to function.
They can also be used for surveillance of the employees, though, so you have to account for your employees' privacy rights when you're deciding how to use and position them. Ought to supersede means that there is a duty or obligation to take the place or position of something. Locke states: Man gives up self-power to be regulated by laws made by the society, so far forth as the preservation of himself, and the rest of that society shall require; which laws of the society in many things confine the liberty he had. The demands of national security and claims to individual rights must be viewed as legitimate. Cameras also help employers monitor the work habits of employees. For anyone interested in human rights abuses in the War on Terror, here is an excellent but appalling documentary for your viewing: Taxi To The Dark Side-BBC Full Length Documentary. When the government restricts rights, it does so to provide security to its citizens. Without security first, rights become invalid and government is unable to function. However, they will not accept their most private moments being recorded.
We discuss the privacy vs security and freedom vs safety dilemmas, and in particular if may not be simply a problem of national security vs privacy, but other civil rights may also be endangered. Home Free Essays National Security. The demands of national security and claims to individual rights must be viewed as legitimate. Convicting those arrested for alleged terrorist offences has been a somewhat hit-and-miss business with more misses than hits.